,

O’bitchuary!

We’re killing all the right people and we’re cutting your taxes.

Lindsey Graham

It’s impossible not to notice the internet revelling over the news of the sudden death of U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham. Public sentiment worldwide has been overwhelmingly negative and bitterly disparaging.

Socially acceptable tradition dictates that mocking the dead is disrespectful, especially to the surviving family members. The taboo is rooted in a very old Latin proverb, De mortuis nil nisi bonum (of the dead, nothing but good is to be said).

But what if the deceased person was genuinely despised, hated even, for being a bigot of every kind imaginable? Do supporters of this person have a morally sound reason to express dismay?

While it may appear objectionable in principle, if there was ever a person who justified being roundly excoriated, it was Lindsey Graham. Let’s cut the bullshit! We live in a wicked world, governed by some of the most vile, degenerate people. Graham was high up on that list of thoroughly despicable beings masquerading as human.

Lindsey Graham was an ageing, racist, malicious warmonger who oozed depravity and hate. He seemed to have a natural ability to incite violence every opportunity he got. His paramount life project appeared to be overseeing the destruction of Iran. At the same time, he delighted in being the snivelling little bitch the war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu could consistently depend on for immoral sustenance and cheerleading.

In interviews, he wasn’t afraid to express a passionate enthusiasm for bombing poor people, who almost always turned out to have brown skin. That brave exuberance was only sullied by his utter spinelessness when he completely capitulated to Donald Trump after that equally miserable creature won the elections.

Graham’s pusillanimity toward Trump evolved from “He’s an opportunist. He’s not fit to be President of the United States,” to “Mr President, you’re not far behind God, but we’re gonna start with him.” Apparently, Trump wooed him on the golf course, which leaves one wondering if his servility included being the caddy?

I came across a Facebook page today which summed up Graham’s pitiful existence quite nicely:

The Facebook Feminist News editorial was also scathingly accurate in its obituary, and I don’t think there is a better indictment of the shameless legacy of American imperialism, of which Graham was a true believer.

From the moment he hit Washington, Graham wrapped himself in “national security” while reliably serving two constituencies: defense contractors and billionaire donors who profit every time the U.S. rattles sabers at Iran. He sold regime change as “freedom,” sanctions as “strength,” and bombing campaigns as “democracy,” while the same rich circles around him cashed in on endless conflict and fear.

Lindsey Graham’s demise is being described as somewhat sudden with a hint of mystery. However, following Iran’s humiliation of the U.S. in yet another manufactured war, I’m inclined to think the hateful warmonger died of acute embarrassment.

Fediverse Reactions

6 responses to “O’bitchuary!”

  1. Bob Lynn Avatar

    I read your post with a mixture of understanding and profound concern. It’s entirely clear that your anger stems from a deeply felt, and arguably justified, frustration with Lindsey Graham’s political legacy. His record on foreign policy, his deference to authoritarian figures, and his alignment with the military-industrial complex are matters of legitimate, rigorous critique. You’re absolutely right to hold power to account.

    However, I must gently challenge the manner of this accounting. While the Latin maxim De mortuis nil nisi bonum shouldn’t be wielded to sanitise a problematic legacy, revelling in a person’s sudden, tragic demise crosses a line from political critique into moral decay. Mocking the dead doesn’t dismantle the systems they upheld; it merely mirrors the very dehumanisation you rightly condemn.

    We must ask ourselves: does tearing down a deceased individual truly advance the cause of justice, or does it simply provide a fleeting emotional release? True intellectual rigour demands that we separate the valid critique of a politician’s actions from the visceral satisfaction of their demise. We can condemn the sin without celebrating the sinner’s end.

    It’s intellectually tempting to craft a poetic narrative where a warmonger dies of acute embarrassment, but that’s a comforting fantasy, not a logical conclusion. The architects of endless conflict aren’t thwarted by our Schadenfreude; they’re entrenched by the same polarised, vindictive discourse that reduces complex geopolitical failures to mere personal vindication.

    If we truly wish to honour the victims of the policies Graham championed, our energy is better spent dismantling the living, breathing machinery of imperialism, rather than kicking at a grave. After all, the most profound rebuttal to a legacy of hate isn’t a celebratory, vindictive obituary; it’s the relentless, empathetic pursuit of a better, more just world.

    Bob

    Liked by 1 person

    1. lenny unencumbered Avatar

      As always, Bob, a well-reasoned response. If my essay sounds like a celebration of Graham’s death, let me assure you it’s not. There is nothing to celebrate in his death. Death was an easy way out for him.
      I would have celebrated had he been arrested and put on trial for his war crimes. Because that would bring closure to his many victims.
      No, the object of my essay was to expose his bigotry and vile nature. Don’t mistake derision for celebration.
      We let far too many people of his ilk off the hook because we always fall into the trap of tolerating the intolerable. It’s time we refused to be silenced by moral blackmail.
      Graham’s trail of wickedness was not limited to warmongering. He was also a misogynist and homophobe. That trail of human wickedness was so visible, obvious, and destructive that it would be dishonest and misleading to gloss it over following his death.
      Far from being satisfied at his death, it feels like a robbery because justice will not have been seen to be done.
      I accept your point about my concluding paragraph being comforting fantasy. Pehaps that was not necessary.
      It does concern me, though, that empathy was not evident in my writing. Perhaps I have subconsciously revealed that my empathy is reserved for those willing to account for their wicked behavior, not those who take it to the grave with them.
      Thank you once again for this response.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. complicatedpoliticsblog Avatar

    Graham was one of the most annoying neo con war mongers of the last 30 years. I’m old enough to remember his cheerleading on television of wanting to invade Iraq in 2003. In the last 3 years he was one of the loudest advocates of pushing for a US invasion of Mexico to war with the drug cartels. Reckless insanity. It just baffles me so much how people keep re-electing these people for 30 years? Even with Graham dead there are still a lot of neo con war mongers still in Congress like Tom Cotton and Rick Scott and nearly everyone in Florida politics

    Liked by 1 person

    1. lenny unencumbered Avatar

      Yes, indeed. Strangely, he wasn’t one of the worst.
      As an outside observer, it’s not baffling to me why people keep voting for warmongers. They’re littered on both sides of the aisle… and your political system has been corrupted to limit people’s choice between the artificial divide.

      Like

      1. complicatedpoliticsblog Avatar

        I have many friends who don’t even vote because they feel hopeless about our corrupted politics

        Liked by 1 person

      2. lenny unencumbered Avatar

        I also stopped voting here in South Africa for many years because the endemic corruption became just too much.
        I resumed voting again but resorted to spoiling my ballots with nasty comments in the last election.
        I am only going to vote on the local council level in the next election and for a party bobody expects to win.

        Liked by 1 person

Please leave a comment or reply

Lenny, here

Join me as I contemplate a bewildering world through empathy, understanding, and a touch of irreverence.

9,434 hits